Jung and easily Freudened!????????????


I find this so strange claiming that D&G are Jungian instead of Freudian. A bit odd! I'd say they are neither. Besides its Felix Guattari who did therapies and analysis not Gilles Deleuze.  Neither of them were 'yjung and easily freudended!' as James Joyce quipped in Finnegans Wake____seriously schizoanalysis is a machine assemblage that uses whatever is at hand. The  idea of usefulness (theory wise and practice wise) i.e. Never Interpret but find out how  agiven machine (A/O) and how a strata can be tipped (AtP) into a molecular line(s) of flight to any given Outside.

___________________besides who gives a hoot?______________________________

it either works And dont