AntiOedipus

This blog continues extends the work of becomings in the Fictions of D&G blogs__ examine&explore the text of A/O but not limit ourselves __ invention and connection stammer stutter __ perform interactions on A/O and oTHER tEXTS oUTside.Language is a machine bodywithoUtOrgans__ Experiment Invent, never interpret. How does the machine work, how does one plug a blog into a famous book, that is itself a translation from another language, another machine, the French language_pragmanticism.

2/05/2013

Jung and easily Freudened!????????????

-------------------------------------

I find this so strange claiming that D&G are Jungian instead of Freudian. A bit odd! I'd say they are neither. Besides its Felix Guattari who did therapies and analysis not Gilles Deleuze. Neither of them were 'yjung and easily freudended!' as James Joyce quipped in Finnegans Wake____seriously schizoanalysis is a machine assemblage that uses whatever is at hand. The idea of usefulness (theory wise and practice wise) i.e. Never Interpret but find out how agiven machine (A/O) and how a strata can be tipped (AtP) into a molecular line(s) of flight to any given Outside.

___________________besides who gives a hoot?______________________________

it either works And dont

______________________

( O Anti Édipo )

The fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil (Hebrew: עֵץ הַדַּעַת טוֹב וָרָע) will throw our hero to a deterritorialization field and a possibility of a life beyond Eden. ---------------------------------------- - O fruto da árvore do conhecimento levará nosso herói pelo campo da desterritorialização e possibilidade de um mundo além do Éden. ---------------------------------------- ----- P&B, 1 minuto, Brasil 2001 - mpg ---------------------------------------- ----- by Vitoriamario ( copyleft - modelo Atribuição-Uso Não-Comercial 2.5 Creative Commons)

«Expérimenter de nouveaux langages pour produire de nouvelles subjectivités, de nouvelles causes et un nouveau regard politique»

A true politics of psychiatry, or antipsychiatry, would consist

therefore in the following praxis: (1) undoing all the reterritorializations

that transform madness into mental illness; (2) liberating the schizoid

movement of deterritorialization in all the flows, in such a way that this

characteristic can no longer qualify a particular residue as a flow of

madness, but affects just as well the flows of labor and desire, of

production, knowledge, and creation in their most profound tendency.

Here, madness would no longer exist as madness, not because it would

have been transformed into "mental illness," but on the contrary because

it would receive the support of all the other flows, including science and

art—once it is said that madness is called madness and appears as such

only because it is deprived of this support, and finds itself reduced to

testifying all alone for deterritorialization as a universal process. It is

merely its unwarranted privilege, a privilege beyond its capacities, that

renders it mad. In this perspective Foucault announced an age when

madness would disappear, not because it would be lodged within the

controlled space of mental illness ("great tepid aquariums"), but on the

contrary because the exterior limit designated by madness would be

overcome by means of other flows escaping control on all sides, and

carrying us along.*

It should therefore be said that one can never go far enough in the

direction of deterritorialization: you haven't seen anything yet—an

irreversible process.

A/0 321 (eng)

De l’ami
F. G. : L’ami, c’est celui qui se tourne vers l’autre. Et qui constitue l’autre. Pas forcément dans un rapport d’identification, parce que l’amitié est parallèle à un rapport agonique. Mais qui, dans ce rapport singulier à l’autre, déploie un certain univers. Dans la complicité amicale, il y a toujours un troisième terme qui est le monde que l’on est en train de tisser, que l’on est en train de travailler. Et l’amitié socratique, ce n’est pas quelque chose qui se résout dans une identification homosexuelle. Dans une incorporation de l’autre. C’est quelque chose qui est là pour tendre un filet qui dépasse complètement les rapports interpersonnels et qui donne une certaine consistance à un certain type d’objets qui sont les objets conceptuels.
______________________________

Entretien avec Félix Guattari en 1991 à la télé grecque en 9 parties via Chimeres

AntiOedipus

2/05/2013

Jung and easily Freudened!????????????

blogarama

escape?