Neither Guattari nor
myself are very attached to the pursuit or even coherence of
what we write. We would hope for the contrary, we would hope that the
follow-up to Anti-Oedipus breaks with what preceded it, with
the first volume, and then, if there are things that don’t work in
the first volume, it doesn’t matter. I mean that we are not among
those authors who think of what they write as a whole that must be
coherent; if we change, fine, so there’s no point in talking to us
about the past.
Deleuze speaking on a Deserted Island
____________________