-----------------------------------------and 40 ~discombining thing working

Push that thing/further/cut/cupcaketake that accent/move that river/rip that resentment /... that's right. as mona's got a children, and more what's what.

Mona took on the trolls patrol running across the side of the body of god the judgment unhinged by theE poetic incarnation of sidereal molecules. writing the page of her health    ~ 

-----------------------------S.Z, en toute orthodoxie, interprète la mésalliance qui l’irrite. Cela donne à peu près ceci :

Deleuze, un jour, est tombé amoureux de Félix et non pas, malheureusement, de Lacan. Félix

                     Yes GillesJill was in love with Felix the cat as happiness was a  loveletter combining not adding up the till of the dialectic  ~.
                                     étant devenu le fils meurtrier de son Père, Deleuze s’est soustrait, avec son comparse, à la 

________________-But I am reading thee history of the english peoples dig. turns out they are Celtic.  Mona feels a thing coming on made ov textassemblage. not blog. but assemblog. no tthe same as assembly line    ~but an assembly is or rather an assembly line is sort of line out the door as its production. buT the secret history of Canada is slavery. as wage working for someone rich corporate taxfree canadadadaa bland.

nécessaire « castration symbolique », que son oeuvre antérieure ne refusait sans doute pas.

Jean-Claude Polack   ~

Jill is gonna move back to Paris and ditching her book on the hegel general moving onto something more exciting.
Zizek’s ‘Lacanian book on Deleuze’ - and you will have understood that the Organ without                                       Body is the Phallus as signifier of castration - this Lacano-Leninist book which borrows its

We're tired of the castrater Generals and their signified war. 

dialectic from the French philosopher (its compulsive mottois ‘As Alain Badiou put it...’) has, in            
_____________Jill climbed out of the mirror without lending. Outlandingher feet abrasive to the god.

my view, the merit of focussing its argument on the ‘Body without Organs’ by reversing and combating the movement that presided over the emergence of this notion in ‘the inner tension of

Deleuze’s thought between Anti-Oedipus(‘Deleuze’s worst book’) and The Logic of Sense, between the (‘Guattarised’) Deleuze who celebrated the productive multitude of Becoming against the reified order of Being and the Deleuze of the sterility of the incorporeal becoming of

the Sense-Event’. This is a movement I tried to track in my essay ‘The BwO Condition or, The Politics of Sensation’. In that piece I could not refrain from recalling the way in which the Body

without Organs ex-pulsed by Artaud dis-organ-ises the philosophical surface structurallydefined by the incorporeal univocity of Being and Language,leading the Logic of Senseinto a veritable

breakdown.The breakdownof structure as a ‘machine for the production of incorporeal sense’ is followed, in Anti-Oedipus- we will return on this at length, of course - by the breakthroughof the

incorporation of a machinic constructivism into a desire that commands becomings...

This is also what the Anti-Oedipusstill tells us thirty years on : that we cannot oppose the will to resist the

Empire of Digital Capitalism which finds expression in the Hyperstructuralism of a Badiou with any kind of

‘weak’ (debole) and late Poststructuralism, thus making room for a spontaneous democracy of desire and its

pop-philosophical flights of fancy. Rather, we must counter it with a transversalist Biopolitics, ‘always to be conquered on a pragmatics of existence’ (as Guattari never ceased repeating) ; a Biopolitics generative of a

heterogeneity whose socially constitutive character is the ontological creativity that sustains the constructivism of desire. The latter prohibits, in vivo, any projection of these questions into a ‘philosophical eternity’, into a

‘politics of Grace’ under the guidance of the militant, or, for that matter, into an ‘inaesthetics’ which is

supposed to produce, ‘through the finite means of a material subtraction’, ‘an infinite subjective series’.

                                                   Eric AllieZ
--------------------------------~ Zizek is simply stuck on a Hegelian strata ~
Clifford Duffy [*]

In Zizek, there is an ideological hinge that he likes to put in play between the truth of an event and what makes it fake, not even to its falsehood, but to the elements that would fake it ‘strategically’: while the truth of a determinate event is not affirmed as such ―.

And though this system remains somehow unnoticed by his most assiduous readers, I bet that if someone would ask him such a thing, he would want with all his bearded heart to respond b), maybe in an act of freeing himself from his own dictating caricature. But he knows that it is too late for that.
Must every schizophrenic tear down his 'own' principle? his 'own' to own is a principle of economics . As Jill wants to beanother economics not made of  Utopic combinations and not godmad unifrom powergamboorganizations,

And from                      SchIZo  SopHy